Wikipedia: Requests for arbitration/Homeopathy

0

Case Opened on 09:56, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Case Closed on 23:40, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Case Amended by by motion on 14:32, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Case Amended by motion on 11:22, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

 

“I bring this here, as the situation seems too complex for the Homeopathy article probation to deal with – or at least, finding anyone willing to wade into that mess is next to impossible.

The issues are complex, and full details are best saved for the evidence phase. Suffice to say that this is by no means an exhaustive list, or even a complete analysis of the problems used as examples. Far more can and will appear in evidence should this case be accepted.”

 

Preliminary decisions

Arbitrators’ opinion on hearing this matter (5/0/0/0)

  • Accept, and given the way the article has been troublesome, the scope of the case should be broad enough to catch editor misconduct generally. Charles Matthews(talk) 17:03, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Kirill 00:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Accept, but with the scope defined as homoeopathy articles rather than this one user. Given that there seems to be dissatisfaction with the community-based article probation, and perhaps some inertia with respect to carrying it out, our involvement is warranted. –bainer(talk) 02:19, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Accept, to look at all involved parties and issues in order to address the problems associated with this-this topic. FloNight♥♥♥11:49, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
  • I too accept. Sam Blacketer(talk) 14:48, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

 

 

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Homeopathy

Share.

About Author

Leave A Reply